Politics
Politics
Out of context: Reply #7590
- Started
- Last post
- 33,772 Responses
- ukit0
I am also curious as to whether those of you who condone the Republican approach to national security think we should waterboard the guy responsible for Tiller's death.
He clearly fits the definition of "terrorist" (violence in order to promote a political aim), and was part of a larger network of similar-minded extremists (according to neighbors he held meetings of anti-abortion extremists in his home). There's no way to say for sure whether other acts may be planned (so the "ticking time bomb" case is applicable). So, to waterboard or not? Or do we only waterboard Muslim terrorists?
- Why waterboard him. He's already guilty!!!
ukit IQ= -69******** - that's BS and an approach that's not part of this discussion. Come on dude.zenmasterfoo
- we shouldn't waterboard him, the electric chair will be fine.fooler2
- Why waterboard him. He's already guilty!!!