2012 for reals?

Out of context: Reply #101

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 151 Responses
  • TheBlueOne0

    "you're choosing to ignore the basic science"

    ARRRRRGGGHH!!!!

    No, I am not ignoring any science whatsoever. For fuck's sake, OF COURSE the solar system revolves around the center of the galaxy. And it does so on a plane. It's orbit is slanted so it crosses the galactic plane. OF COURSE IT FUCKING DOES, when did I say it didn't. That's the basic science. No fucking shit.

    YOU are the one that brings Jenkins into it, I point out the guy is not a credible source and then you say "Well, forget Jenkins...focus on the science.." What science?? You mean the interpretation you just copy and pasted FROM Jenkins material, whose whole point is to use a tiny bit of common, average scientific knowledge and parlay it into a way to put food on his table and change in his bank account by telling people about it having something to do with the Mayan caledar and the "end of a spiritual age"?? WHAT FUCKING BASIC SCIENCE ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT???

    And by the way, his interpretation of the Mayan calendar is disputed by actual archeologists.

    Fuck, you are a rube.

    • the science of galactical alignment you push aside for a bunch of newage shit you love to lambaste. has nothing to do with the point of galactical alignmentKwesiJ
    • with my basic point of the mayans understanding the scientific fact of galactical alignmentKwesiJ

View thread