2012 for reals?
Out of context: Reply #98
- Started
- Last post
- 151 Responses
- TheBlueOne0
Oh, and as for all the psuedo-science babble you quoted about galactic angles and shit, the guy who came up with that, this Jenkins quack? He has no training in astronomy, however he has written book after book about mayans, crystal skulls and pyramids. He has published ZERO papers in any scholarly journal, doesn't disclose what university he went to to learn about the "ancient mayans" but makes a living selling his crappy books thought New Age publishers and giving seminars and his website comes straight out of 1997.
And I'm the ignorant one?
You say there's real science? Please link me to peer reviewed published scholarly works by Jenkins. One. Just one. Link me to where he got his degree and in what field. Tell me what university he teaches at.
Here's an example of Jenkins "reasoning": "The universe is revealed as a multidimensionally interwoven ecology of evolving intelligences, set to make their presence known by AD 2012. How else do transdimensional influences emerge into our world unless they have been brought through the central nexus via a type of conjuring."
No. Science. At. All. None. Not even a vaguely interesting or useful spiritual line of inquiry. Just psychobabble to sell books and videos to the rubes who need a sense of control over their life.
- watever man galactical alignment is fact, its a mathematical astronomical FACT. forget jenkins...you could probably find an astronomy text book with it in itKwesiJ
- ...could probably find a text book writing about it. The mayans accuracy was verified by modern scientists...all this was in doc I sawKwesiJ
- in a doc I saw.KwesiJ
- once again you're choosing to ignore the basic science and focus on some quakery. Just because he goes on about this other stuff doens't nagte the reality of this alignmentKwesiJ
- other stuff doesn't negate the reality of this alignmentKwesiJ