there is a god

Out of context: Reply #69

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 105 Responses
  • BRNK0

    Teleos, the epistemological argument you posted simply says "Science can not prove that god doesn't exist, therefor he does." If that isn't a shining example of a "naked" argument, I don't know what is.

    Our scientific knowledge is full of holes, true, but only religion is so arrogant as to claim it has the answers without so much as a stitch of evidence FOR it's claims.

    Also, you never addressed my concerns about the societal cost of dogmatic ideologies, which is a far more pressing issue than the mental gymnastics of the epistemological proof of god.

View thread