Politics
Out of context: Reply #6913
- Started
- Last post
- 33,773 Responses
- TheBlueOne0
Is this your question?
"All I'm asking is, what would you do? What's an okay form of interrogation for you?"
Then we're arguing apples and oranges. Us "lefty" *cough cough* types are arguing that making the use of torture officially stated policy by the government is unethical and illegal. And for all the reasons I stated in my above post. I also gave the caveat that torture does in fact happen. I'm primarily taking issue with GetRefresh's moronic concept that those who made the use of torture official policy of the United States of America shouldn't be held accountable for violating long established signed treaties, conventions and military law.
Now, in the heat of the moment of ""All I'm asking is, what would you do? What's an okay form of interrogation for you?" if I was operating under the idea that I could ACTUALLY extract useful information from the individual in a time frame in which that information would in fact save lives? Well I'd put bamboo shoots up the motherfuckers ass faster than you could spell "Dick Cheney". But most intelligence and military professionals rarely come across such a scenario and secondly I would have severe reservations about if the information I extracted was both truthful and actionable.