<===Richard Kern
Out of context: Reply #50
- Started
- Last post
- 64 Responses
- veraicon0
pr2:
i hope you didn't misunderstood me and the paragraph. i was stating that painting, sculpture and the likes of fine art will be seen as ART no matter what. Even if they are used for commercial purposes they are still considered art for the most part.
But that is not the case with photography and that is why photography has a hard time getting credited as ART in the long established art community. Because it has such a great use for commercial purposes. Adds, commercials, etc...
I would never discredit painting of any fine art form. My fathers work is in the Permanent Smithsonian collection , and i have grown up in the Fine Art world since birth. I have a very good understanding of that is Fine Art and what isn't.
You stated:
"This tread is one more reason why designers should never call themselves artists. Artists would just look at it and chill while uptight businessmen-artist-wannab
es get ofended. "WOW, you must be kidding me? right? do you honestly assume one is an artist because they are "CHILL" and not "OFFENDED"???
I will not get into such remarks. i think that is very thoughtless and entirely based in your own opinion. it doesn't have any standing in this thread.
I believe that there is a very good conversation going on in this tread and we need not get aggressive and start insulting people just because you don't see the same way.
Pr2, then I ask you. Are you a designer? Or an artist? Its a rhetorical question. we need not get into an entirely different discussion.