<===Richard Kern
<===Richard Kern
Out of context: Reply #44
- Started
- Last post
- 64 Responses
- unknown0
Some of the images are sexually suggestive, but none of them are sexually explicit. I've seen fashion ads that are more sexually suggestive.
Perhaps you're confusing pornography which is defnined objectively as sexually (or violently) explicit vs art which is almost entirely subjective and therefore subject to more dialoge and scrutiny.
I agree that there are some provocative images which relate more to an implied sexual situation then an actual sexual situation. This is largly no different from many Calvin Klein ads. Some CK ads in Europe have even been known to show femail pubic hair from time to time.
What specifically do people find offensive about this person's work? And don't just say it's porn.