blog

Out of context: Reply #41259

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 76,749 Responses
  • Corvo20

    I don't know why you're thinking about ditching "fluxism" - all I know is that a name that relates to a given body or work is hard to establish these days. I wouldn't change it unless you have real good reasons to do so.

    I like your work, m_r . It's looks very american to me and you use the Cam typeface very appropriately, which I don't think is easy to achieve. Somehow the coherence of what you do reminds me of Bau Da Lab Design in the good old days. In short, it will never be outdated.

    Corvo2 0Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • so I guess it's a NO.Corvo2
    • I was afraid fluxism sounded hokey, bogus, or pretentious
      ********
    • or more arty than the work therein
      ********
    • not dying to change it if it's not that bad
      ********
    • thanks for the kind words, corvo
      ********
    • Well, I honestly cannot say what "fluxism" sounds like since I'm not a native to english. "Flux" relates to art-by-instruction here...Corvo2
    • ... -instructions around here, which I think is not inappropriate for design. Artsy, yes, but it's not pretentious.Corvo2
    • "artsy" is not the right word. "Fluxism" here relates more to controlled "flow", "output" rather than art&fancy.Corvo2
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread