Site crit
Out of context: Reply #51
- Started
- Last post
- 52 Responses
- airey0
cam i just ask, if you make the point of offering cutting edge, why is none of your work that? i'm not taking a cheap shot here but ther's nothing in any of the work shown that is remotely cutting edge?
• your sites are built using tables rather than css positioning (which isn't cutting edge anymore anyway, simply standard).
• the css you do use for styles is inline rather than in an external style sheet.
• these sites are not search engine friendly nor in fact user friendly: the main nav in the building bridges site doesn't even commit to mouseOver change states. obviously you've committed time to meta tags but they are simply redundant now as google don't use them and in fact less and less search engines bother with them. the page header (which google does require) is the same on all your pages which isn't a good thing.
• obviously you operate an ok set of skills and probably leave your clients happy and coming back but you shouldn't push cutting edge or other bold statements if you yourself don't do that.
just my 2 cents. in transparency i still haven't even done my own site so you can label me with a glass house but you asked for a crit.