new cravendale site

Out of context: Reply #25

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 27 Responses
  • skt0

    i looked at it, thought it was ok, nothing that really required a physics engine though... then read a few of the comments here didn't understand why everyone was wetting their pants, went back and discovered that you can throw things around.

    i think if you’re going to spend all that time giving the site a physics engine, so that you can throw things around, you should make it a little more obvious to the users.

    i'm kind of with craig on this though, why?

View thread