blog

Out of context: Reply #38677

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 76,746 Responses
  • Jaline0

    Mr100: "The best thing about fff for me is that sheer basic-ness – no tags, no search, no bs, just images."

    FFFFound should at least have a search function. I'm not sure how it would even work, but I disagree with including "not having a search function" in the "best things about it" list. I find FFFFound to be slightly useless without a search function. I can still find images, but it's very inefficient to be looking through dozens of pages to find one thing. I can also understand how tags would clutter it, but it may be the best way to search for an image. It should be like delicious, but still simple with the design.

    I'm just too lazy to move over to any other system. Perhaps if they allowed you to transfer the images to ImageSpark (or whatever other image saving site there is), I would think about moving.

    Jaline 0Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • I like to stumble on forgotten things while I am looking for a particular image.MrOneHundred
    • I also like that it lets you be in hurry adding images, but doesn’t when looking at your images.MrOneHundred
    • That's true. But I'm not sure it outweighs being able to find an image quickly. Maybe we could still look through images for fun.Jaline
    • Those are good points. I wish you could have the option of enabling certain features. So ppl who don't want them don't have to use them.Jaline
    • to use them.Jaline
    • I have them saved in iPhoto too for quick searches.QBNCitizen
    • For the recors FFFFound sucks, period!utopian
    • "record"utopian
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread