blog

Out of context: Reply #38479

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 76,746 Responses
  • ********
    0

    re: http://www.qbn.com/topics/329751… via
    http://www.qbn.com/topics/329751… as being "product of trend imperatives" — i would argue that the approach created, cultivated and (perhaps now thoughtlessly (this being where my own (unspoken (not-even-parenthetical)) critique lies)) regurgitated at the institution that is the WT, is roughly 5 times more responsible and aesthetically justifiable than most of what we ffffind to be the utterly deplorable, plebeian output of said NP.

    ********
    0Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • of course--my only point is that trendwhoring comes in many guises
      ********
    • Good For You!
      ********
    • (Go Fuck Yourself!)
      ********
    • I'm a designer-nobody, so don't think I delude myself I'm critiquing from a superior vantage, just pointing out what I think are trendwhore blinspots
      ********
    • are trendwhore blindspots
      ********
    • you FUCKING TRENDWHORE ACADEMIC
      ********
    • (I have no legs...)
      ********
    • YET!
      ********
    • maybe you'll get tenure
      ********
    • madness, starving hysterical naked
      ********
    • (tenure of delusion)
      ********
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread