blog
blog
Out of context: Reply #33774
- Started
- Last post
- 76,737 Responses
- kelpie0
I'm glad you did though. It got me thinking about it and all those types of 'resources', which taken together is utterly worthy of debate.
There's a lot of massively important points to that argument which touch on the change in what we're exposed to as a result of contributing to it, post-internet, and whether the functional framework of something which is designed in that way is capable of self-sorting in a manner that allows it to ever find the equivalent of editorial quality control.
- fuck that was a long sentence. see max's post abovekelpie
- Any chance of re-presenting this in French?Horp
- is it really that shrouded in wanky language? I worry I'm too far up my own arsehole at a time when I need to be able to communicate clearly :-/kelpie
- ...clearly, for my workkelpie
- It was just too sophisticated for me I think. ...Horp
- I couldn't tell if you were being sincere, or just saying something grandiose for fun.Horp
- * Munches mushy pea pie.Horp
- its sincere, imagine fffound were a news source, instead of an image service. Wouldn't that be dangerous?kelpie
- Yes, that, if anything, was my point I suppose. Paul Horrell writes an interesting article about that in....Horp
- ... January's Top Gear magazine, about the decline in journalism over population sorted, unsubstantiated, "information".Horp
- "information".Horp
- we have to edit everything ourselves, but I doubt most of us are capable yet....kelpie
- ...and more and more people distrust 'authority' figures in editorial roleskelpie