Dirtylipbalm

Out of context: Reply #44

• Started
• Last post
• 95 Responses

• fate_0

  Airey, I think beyond simply saying "this is a rip!", a more important question is which of his works is actually his? Which ideas can he own, legitimately?

  This is important to answer, for him, for us. Especially since he's calling himself an "Art Director". If you want to make the argument that any of those pieces I called out are from "styles" or "methods" that are so well established, then you also have to make the argument that none of the work I've posted actually belongs to Ravi...it's not his work, it's the "communities" or "design industry" or whoever you want to attribute them to. But not his.

  It's a question of originality.

  fate_ 0Permalink

  UpvoteDownvote

  Flag

  • that there is a good point.airey
  • personally i think the idea of owning ideas is where the argument fails.johndiggity
  • Yeah, fuck a concept. Style over substance!fate_

  Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note

  SaveCancel

View thread