God is quite busy

Out of context: Reply #144

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 301 Responses
  • Khurram0

    I believe we are god. That "god" is not seperate from us. That we are god conciousness. Not just me and you, the world of humans. But the world of objects and the world of facts. The world of abstraction as well as the world of physics.

    That what creates "seperateness" and indivduated destiny is the illusion. And in reality we are all one consciousness participating in one destiny. Destiny of "god", which WE create - or rather participate in.

    Just like each neuron firing in your brain, as well as its velocity and acceleration, is the essence of what your perceive yourself to be you. God is the existence in time of the universe, consciousness that permeates the universe, and the world of human values is part of that consciousness, but not its object.

    In other words, it's not a question of whether *i* have a soul. More, does God have a soul. And yes it does, and we are it.

    In other words. *I* am GOD.

    Khurram 0Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • Well, at least you're honest with yourself to some degree. Good luck with the whole self-worship thing.gramme
    • Personally I think you make a shitty god. So do I, for that matter.gramme
    • sorry my man. But there is no VALUE judgement in god essence.Khurram
    • wtf? i cut this hunt, what's he donig in my notes?Khurram
    • Where on earth do you get such an idea? Your imagination does not = Scripture, my friend.gramme
    • idea of what? that there is no VALUE judgement? it's called philosophy... something a bit more robust than your..Khurram
    • scraps of paper you call "scripture".Khurram
    • who wrote this philosophy, pray tell? You?gramme
    • scripture written and doctored by a ton of people who don't have the best intentions over hundreds of years serving a variety of political causes at their respective times versus khurram little speech. seems to me his is a little more honest if not just as kookyspifflink
    • political causes at their respective times versus khurram little speech. seems to me his is a little more honest if not just as kookyspifflink
    • as kookyspifflink
    • If you study the original manuscripts and original languages, many of which are still accessible, you'll see there hasn't been any tampering.gramme
    • hasn't been any tampering.gramme
    • what?Khurram
    • dude, philosophy is an intellectual pursuit. Yours is the veneration of an ancient artefact. Capice?Khurram
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread