God is quite busy

Out of context: Reply #114

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 301 Responses
  • VectorMasked0

    I think we can safely end this with this:

    In terms of balance, there is more proof on the side of "gawd does not exist" than on the "i've never seen it, but it has to exist coz my daddy told me so".

    this is the actual reality. The current proof that exists is that there is no proof at all whatsoever of the existence of a character. This gives "not believing in gawd" a clear edge.

    • its not that god DOESNT exist, but that its very very very unlikely he does, and very very very unlikely that he exists in the form people think a deity ought to. the cards are stacked against it. maybe?spifflink
    • people think a deity ought to. the cards are stacked against it. maybe?spifflink
    • religious earthling maybe a bit egocentric?spifflink
    • but then there's the whole factor of outside revelation, which you cannot prove to be non-existent.gramme

View thread