crit
Out of context: Reply #10
- Started
- Last post
- 11 Responses
- Nairn0
From a distance, I think it'll look like "ctrosoplre'e", or something.
There doesn't appear to be much consistency between the letter forms - why, for instance, do you have those details on the t and the r? Why have you split the h in two?
What do the details you've employed represent? What's the logic behind them (and, by extension, across the form)?
For a start, I'd shunt out each letter and size them so they all match or complement each other - the curves in the m and the height of the s are completely out of sync with the rest of the form. Once you've got approximately-matched letters, then work on the integration between them.
Personally, I feel that you'd be better off with very clean letters and perhaps only one or two quirky details/joins across the word - at the moment, there's just too much clashing detail, and I can't see what it all adds.
- In short - less is more.
:)Nairn - lol
i understand what u mean thoWeLoveNoise
- In short - less is more.