Logotype Critique

Out of context: Reply #7

• Started
• Last post
• 32 Responses

• anairn0

  I love #1, and would have to disagree with SpookyPoo about its inherent 'Christianity' - I think you've tread the line very carefully and come up with a solution that (for me) evokes a flame which somehow seems relevant to me as a Christian symbol, yet isn't overwhelmingly so. I'm not sure if this is just throwback to whatever brand it was that came on the Bibles we had to read as kids at school), but it works.

  Struggling to come up with something to criticise - I think the tail of the f is a bit weak, and if I was only moderately more stupid than I already am, I might be inclined to mix up the l for an i.

  anairn 0Permalink

  UpvoteDownvote

  Flag

  • I think it was ingrained assumption that a church organisation wouldn't go for something 'funky'...SkyPoo
  • ... having commited my words to screen though I realised I was expressing a certain prejudice.SkyPoo
  • ( not 'a certain prejudice' but ' a certain AMOUNT of prejudice' is what I mean)SkyPoo

  Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note

  SaveCancel

View thread