value of a life

Out of context: Reply #5

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 11 Responses
  • ukit0

    When you read the explanation, it kind of makes sense:

    When drawing up regulations, government agencies put a value on human life and then weigh the costs versus the lifesaving benefits of a proposed rule. The less a life is worth to the government, the less the need for a regulation, such as tighter restrictions on pollution.

    Consider, for example, a hypothetical regulation that costs $18 billion to enforce but will prevent 2,500 deaths. At $7.8 million per person (the old figure), the lifesaving benefits outweigh the costs. But at $6.9 million per person, the rule costs more than the lives it saves, so it may not be adopted.

    • so definitely try and live near important people._salisae_

View thread