Red Lobster

Out of context: Reply #14

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 21 Responses
  • 2cents0

    Who the hell eats at Red Lobster?

    And yes, it was originally considered food for the poor.

    "In North America prior to the 20th century, local lobster was not a popular food. In the Maritimes, eating lobster was considered a mark of poverty or as a food for slaves or lower members of society. Lobsters were also used as a fertilizer for farms. Outside of the rural outports lobster was sold canned.

    The market for lobster changed with the development of the modern transportation industry that allowed live lobsters to be shipped from the ports to large urban centres. Fresh lobster quickly became a luxury food and a tourist attraction for the Maritime provinces and Maine and an export to Europe and Japan where it is especially expensive."

    • quoted from "The Secret Life of Lobsters"WeAreDAG
    • same with tuna. it was considered a very low quality fish for a long time.sikma

View thread