Me Keep Gun, OK!
Out of context: Reply #40
- Started
- Last post
- 52 Responses
- TheBlueOne0
Interesting how broad the Supreme Court interprets the 2nd amendment today - so broadly as to give the benefit of the doubt to the individual and the enforcement of his rights on carrying a firearm in despite the odd and unclear statement "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state", yet somehow uses an incredibly narrow legal construct to say it's OK for the government to spy on you despite the clear language in the statement "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause..." when it seems to this observer that the 2nd example is far more clear and exact in intent and meaning...
In other words, they utilize the "original intent" framework for pure political purposes while wearing their sanctimonious impartial rulings on their sleeves.*
*I think I mixed about three metaphors there.
- Such a strange double standard here. Fear outweighs any type of outrage.Mimio