ec: Jo Longhurst

Out of context: Reply #3

• Started
• Last post
• 3 Responses

• ********

  0

  I think the statement just tries to establish the broad, abstract theme of her work. So i guess there´s really nothing to understand there, it´s not math. Just relations/reflections between man/fashion/pet as design object/etc. helpful?

  ********

  0Permalink

  UpvoteDownvote

  Flag

  • not really. I read that as "I need some bullshit statement to justify taking pictures of dogs"flashbender
  • Which is unnecessary. If you want to take pictures of dogs and make a story out of it, then just do thatflashbender
  • well, you got that right. but the art people actually think that way. which is why everybody loathes them.
    ********

  Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note

  SaveCancel

View thread