gay marriage

Out of context: Reply #35

• Started
• Last post
• 54 Responses

• ********

  0

  Let me clarify one thing. I don't think being gay is wrong. I really don't care or judge anyone's sexual expectations and their way of life.

  But one thing pisses me off: whining about equal rights that are already consecrated by Law. It can make sense elsewhere - I do not question that, but it doesn't make sense here. Any sort of couple can register under a "de facto" relationship and live happily ever after with equal tributary law.

  ********

  0Permalink

  UpvoteDownvote

  Flag

  • you have a copy of black's law dictionary on your lap?Llyod
  • where are you coming from and what is "blacl law"?
    ********
  • Anyway... gay vindication here is about adoption rights. Not about acceptance.
    ********
  • equal tributary law? de facto? why should marriage be just for straight people?monkeyshine
  • inheritances, power of attorney, these are 2 other reasons for it.mrdobolina

  Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note

  SaveCancel

View thread