Lightroom vs Aperture

Out of context: Reply #20

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 22 Responses
  • ismith0

    I use Aperture 2, but I only use it for cataloging purposes. I very rarely need to edit photos since I'm so used to film, although I do occasionally adjust WB. The only time I really need to do selective coloring and such is when using it for a project at which point I'll have it in Photoshop anyway.

    ismith 0Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • One of the things that brought me to LR was the fact that I like to rifle through a bunch of editsninjasavant
    • on multiple pics and jumping back and forth between whatever and Photoshop was kinda annoying and time intensive . . .ninjasavant
    • intensive. LR helps speed up my workflow and leaves PS for the intense edits.ninjasavant
    • That's my point; my only edits are the intense ones for specific projects. Otherwise, I'm fine with just having a pretty browsing interface.ismith
    • interface, which to me is Aperture.ismith
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread