Pico, Emacs or Vi ??
Pico, Emacs or Vi ??
Out of context: Reply #26
- Started
- Last post
- 34 Responses
- ribit0
I still think these things should be more graphical...or at least be graphical-ready...If they then decide that they want to use text as the interface for good usability reasons...fine... but why stay in the 70's just because thats the way it's always been done?
Taking the photoshop example a bit furhter...you wouldn't want to type 'make a soft airbrush line up to the right, no down a bit, no left, hang on' would you?
I think even the shell could use an intelligent mix of 'classical' (plain text, move cursor around with arrow keys, type 'y' for yes etc..)and some modern interface elements... it could be a lot richer.