someone asked me for a

Out of context: Reply #21

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 26 Responses
  • lilbabyleg0

    I can explain the law perfectly...

    When a client has a gang of money, it's usually not their money and therefore the client doesn't have as much of a vested interest in every nickel and fucking dime....

    BUT when the money is low. it's usually the clients own money and since it's low, they value every last fucking penny. and furthermore since the money is low they are not particularly successful at what they do or have done in life so the money takes on even more value to them because it might be their llast dollar to gamble with. it's a downward spiral of cheapness.

View thread