ok, seriously.
ok, seriously.
Out of context: Reply #32
- Started
- Last post
- 44 Responses
- ********0
My point is, just because you don't like or even despise a person's idea (that happens to me a lot, like anybody else) you cannot or should not go around calling them trolls just from what you suspect what their peevish ramblings or intention might be. That is intellectual as feebleness (defined as the opposite of good spirited discussion). Making a strong attack -given that it is made in respectful manner- on a given piece of artwork be it a drawing, a print, a story or a music piece is a sound intellectual tradition that can only push us forward and it's not a crime. An attack on a piece of work is not an attack on the person who made it, but just on the piece that person has made.
- "attack" defined as a positive clash of different arguments.********
- hey what i've said doesn't apply for those who believe in art as a lifestyle or an expression. that's different.********
- "attack" defined as a positive clash of different arguments.