Bhutto killed
Bhutto killed
Out of context: Reply #53
- Started
- Last post
- 72 Responses
- teleos0
"right" and "wrong" only have any meaning if there is an absolute standard with which to juxtapose them. Otherwise, what is right for you may not be right for me (and who is to judge?). Superstition has nothing to do with this; it is a matter of logic. The point of the argument is that right and wrong must have immaterial value and not reducable to social conventions, etc... The only other option is that they are the product of the human mind and therefore die when the human mind is gone from this earth. ie. prior to the human mind, there was no such thing as right or wrong, as this is what a materialistic framework necessitates. And therefore, such concepts are illusory and useless.
- ...and therefore something beyond blind material causes must be the originator of what we recognize as right and wrong.teleos
- yeah that thing is called societal norms. in times of war people kill, are they all heallbound?mrdobolina
- there is no absolute standardribit
- Good job, ribit. Do you mind then if we go out and rob the elderly together? I mean, it's acceptable by MY standard of right and wrong. It's a stress reliever.teleos