The bible..
Out of context: Reply #541
- Started
- Last post
- 571 Responses
- gramme0
pandasthumb, thanks for proving that knowledge does not equal wisdom.
The only mistake I will admit to is suggesting the non-word "incredulosity" over incredulity.
You don't know anything about anyone on here, you barge in and write a novel in an attempt to debunk the beliefs of those like flagellum and myself. You haven't really proved anything in your little term paper besides the fact that you are an angry person who thinks very highly of their own intellect.
Are you surprised that I'm not a scientist? Last time I checked, designers and people in design-related fields were the demographic around here. I mentioned the vapor canopy theory not because I am sure I buy it, but because it is a theory that has been put out there in the past. I am very aware that there is a lack of credible scientific literature on that subject. Sorry I didn't clarify, I didn't know we had biologists waiting to pounce from the sidelines.
Show me some literature that disproves the possibility of Creationism. I'll read it tomorrow, as I have work to accomplish today, and will reply in an email with my thoughts.
I'm fully aware of the definition of atheism (a belief that there is no God) and secular humanism (a system of belief and practice that excludes all manifestations of deity in the functions of civilized society). Atheism and secular humanism are intrinsically linked. Have you ever heard of a secular humanist who was not atheistic? Charles F. Potter, a seminal atheist / secular humanist describes secular humanism in the very title of one of his books as "A New Religion". Sounds like any other dogma to me. See, I paid attention in my philosophy classes as well.
FYI my screen name hasn't jack shit to do with science, if you intend to pull a cheap shot then you should know what you're talking about first.