God's warriors
Out of context: Reply #296
- Started
- Last post
- 703 Responses
- gramme0
I don't really care about peoples private lives, as long as you're not hurting anyone what you believe as an adult is none of my business but when you come into a public forum making fallacious claims about the universe we co-exist in you had better damn well expect my mockery and derision.
Brookoioioi
(Aug 27 07, 14:37)Fallacious claims? Prove it. I've said before that I can't fully prove my belief in creationism because NO ONE WAS THERE WHEN IT HAPPENED. You can't fully prove your belief in Darwinism because NO ONE WAS THERE WHEN IT HAPPENED.
Fine if you think my belief in Creationism is fallacious. I don't care about that. There simply isn't a need to belittle someone's intelligence or to say that God is a myth when you CANNOT prove such a notion. You don't hear me mocking you, even though I believe Darwinism to be founded on a pile of lies, do you??? If you still fail to see the difference, then I am probably wasting my time here.
-------------------------
It would be so easy for God to prove his own existence, it'd only have to do it once and 'poof' this argument would disappear.
Brookoioioi
(Aug 27 07, 08:37)I didn't avoid this answer in my rebuttal before. You just didn't like my answer. I told you that God DID come to earth, with skin on, and he DID prove his existence to people alive at that time. Some bought it, most didn't.
God proves his existence every day by speaking to those who look for him. He proves his existence by changing people from the inside out – people like you and me who are fundamentally incapable of true goodness. God proves his existence through Scripture. Not a word of is has been disproven, and not a word of it has been shown to be without good use for instructing and learning. God proves his existence every day through his mind-boggling creation which screams in its very warp and woof the intelligent hand of a CAUSOR. There is no good reason why creationism is unviable. I am no scientist (I devote much of my time to learning about God, and not nearly as much studying every move of the scientific community), but I understand enough about physics to know that everything in motion was acted upon. Infinite causality simply does not make sense. You go back far enough, and there has to be a thing, whatever you want to call it, that is eternal and doesn't require something to act upon IT in order to facilitate motion, Existence, creation, you, me.
Forget all your science, there is a fundamental, untenable flaw in the Darwinist model that deflates the whole framework of theory, right down at the root of it all. Darwinism at its core is a philosophy, and a very poor one at that.