FFFFound
Out of context: Reply #43
- Started
- Last post
- 368 Responses
- ********0
I didn't explain it correctly.
Thing is the "twist-of-tongue" is the defining characteristic for western european languages. They are the only ones that do so in all the languages that derive from the original arian tongue.
What happened was that the learned adaptive-constructive character of roman and german (arian languages) that had breed in Italy, the eastern Europe realms and the East, was perfect to incorporate the stritc language form of the west. Negotiation languagues from the east met the moralist (celtic) language from the west.
So the conclusion is that the "xl", "ll", "nh", "ghl" is a specific characteristic where german and latin met the institutioned celtic varied languages and the result was simple:
in the north a symbiosis between the double gaelic accent consonant (LL, CC = XLE, XRE) and the germanic noun-driven language prolonging the consonant and deriving an action in time with an "active" vowel (e.g. XLE-(a)(e)(u):NG)
Also a social component was involved. The distinction between masculin and feminin did not enter the language - which makes people believe it was unexistant - such as today.
and in the south a substantive (masculine, feminine - term) driven construction where the phrase derives from the thing that is invoked according to genre:
XLE-ANHO
XLE-ANHAwhere masculine/feminine distinctions rule most of the particulars of language.
This excepting Basque, which is far beyond my reach.