Olympic Logo… Hmmmm?
Out of context: Reply #630
- Started
- Last post
- 861 Responses
- kelpie0
Look (and I'm going to stop ranting about this after this, cos I reckon I must be boring the crap out of everybody ;) ) I'm not in any way against the concept that it can be developed, that's good, that it is being pitched as 'democratic' and 'inclusive'; great, different from the past, ok cool. But saying these things does not make the fact that the thing is pretty rank any better, new does not equal good. All the noble aims of the project could have been explored and reflected in something much more appropriate, something that doesn't look like a bad scamp for the new Erol Alkan poster.
I've hit a bad rant-wave now, I really should shut up, but surely you can see my point? I can see the other argument from a lot of angles myself, it almost makes it more dissapointing, like they got caught up in those aspects of the job and forgot about the basic requirements.
peace to all, I'm off to dunk my head in some cold water.