wtf
Out of context: Reply #27
- Started
- Last post
- 38 Responses
- ********0
ok tyranisus..
im with skt on this... its abit all over the place..
anchoring ur menu down doesnt imply structure..
the three typefaces font really harmonise,
the crosses seem superfluous.. (not in a gd way- more like .. "yeaaah i'm Kerrazzzy with 3 Z's") they are also far too chunky to be supporting graphics.. they attract oo much attention. rather than just filling in as decoration
the hierarchy is totally messed up
1 the menu is on the right (and since we read left to right... ur gonna have to emphasise the menu a bitmore.. to stand out from all the other stuff around it.)
2 the close button has more emphasis than the menu.. (bit negative no?)
3 the 'close cross' is too chunky
4the logo is awkwardly floatingalso the nothing is aligned with nothing.. [structure] besides the little boxes on the right being retrospectively aligned to the main display
main display is also awkwardly off center
also the best bit is the media player up top.. but thats gimmicks that u attach when the core is established.. it looks like u put effort into that.. and then thought .."fuck it" and threw the site together
and lastly its sadly all about web 2.0 - round shiny or at the very least smooth...
that is not organic!! sharp edges 45&90 degree angles = mechanised!! [see "BionicSystems"] {probably what skt mean by 2000 style site]
hope it helps