Grand Canyon
Out of context: Reply #8
- Started
- Last post
- 14 Responses
- mikotondria20
Just waiting for Flagellum to come on and start telling us the grand canyon is only 4000 years old, and that, by extension, all the work done by scientists into various forms of radiogenic dating, theory and engineered diagnostics are flawed by the fact that someone added up all the dates in an arbitrary collection of middle eastern manuscripts and it didnt agree. Oh yes, I forgot - this collection of 'books' (Gr. Biblios), was dictated to the authors by a personality that in some way is connected to the primal force that created the universe, and is therefore (however internally contradictory) infallibale.
Stupid scientists with their stupid observations and theories. Especially that Galileo - oh no, we changed our mind about him - just those other ones.