The evolution of skill
The evolution of skill
Out of context: Reply #27
- Started
- Last post
- 39 Responses
- flagellum0
Brookoi: You haven't the faintest idea what the book is about. Yet you dismiss a priori. (Because you're tragically dishonest, of course).
The book is an assault on *philosophical* materialism, using emperical evidence. Who better to write about philosophical underpinnings than philosopher phD's??? I'll give you a minute to put on your thinking cap and try to factor that one out.
Further, everyone has some form of bias. This why we have to look at the arguments/data on it's own merits. (It doesn't take an expert logician to figure this out. ;)) This is why I've given that sophist Dawkins a chance despite the fact that he's a flaming atheist fundamentalist.