No Evolution No Way
No Evolution No Way
Out of context: Reply #66
- Started
- Last post
- 191 Responses
- flagellum0
brookoioi: Note how brook doesn't deal with the evidnces i listed, but rather dodges them. Instead he/she regurgitates Dawkins's rediculous argument about an infinite regress, not realizing that the finger is pointed squarely at she and Dawkins. Because if I postulate purely materialistic causation for matter and energy, I end up in an infinite regress of finite causes. Got that? Write that down.
And no, NS most certainly does not produce specified complex information which is required in producing biological novelty. And I challenge you to produce one paper which demonstrates that it does. I won't hold my breath.