Worst Person in the World
Out of context: Reply #258
- Started
- Last post
- 268 Responses
- flagellum0
flavorful: that of course is all uninformed nonsense. First, Intelligent Design is not anti-Evolution. Evolution meaning: change over time. What ID challenges is the Darwinian Synthesis that claims that undirected, blind mechanisms accidentally produced complexity. This is not science. It is a narrative that is untestable and unsupported by the evidence.
ID can be tested - we can test irreducible complexity of biochemical machinery, for instance. By removing components and watching the machinery break. This, according to Darwin himself, falsifies his theory.
ID says nothing of any higher being. You are conflating the science with it's implications. There are ID proponents who are agnostics. Many of them are. ID simply states that there are patterns in nature which are best explained by intelligent design. Period.
What is immoral is denying children a complete unbiased education. Hiding the facts from them. This is what is thoroughly unethical.