mancini logo crit 2
Out of context: Reply #2
- Started
- Last post
- 10 Responses
- Nairn0
imo, the logic you've employed in your golden mean one is irrelevant. At the very least, your text height should be scaled within the relationship - but doesn't appear to be.
The other logos are.. veering further away from where they oughta be - Rasko's comment yesterday about Whitechapel Bangladeshis (or whatever) seems particularily pungent now I see your new efforts, 1 - 4.
When I started out (I still am, of course), I always found that I'd start thinking about Golden Relationships when I didn't have a clue otherwise how to employ a design/logo/etc.
Maybe it's time to go back and pad out that moodboard - 'what exactly are you trying to achieve'?
btw. I still, in opposition to everyone here, think there's room for manoeveur with that 'awful' M you used yesterday - at least that was strong and personable.
Good luck, man
x