Why Go Live?
Out of context: Reply #18
- Started
- Last post
- 18 Responses
- corin0
I've never used GoLive but I've always been interested in it. DW is constantly a dissapointment, its interface is awful to use, its workflow is yukky, why do I 'have' to define a site before i make it. WHat if i only want to make somehting that is three pages full, why do i need to go through that nonsense, and why can't i do it afterwards without getting all those silly warnings. Why is the CSS functionality laid out in the most long winded fashion possible, and whoever said that macromedia invented the image slicing - rollover concept (i'm dubious but i don't know) well good on them, i'm glad they came up with such a wondeful idea, but they excuted it with such superb crapness that they deserved to get steamrolled by adobe and imageready. Everyone knows that IR is pretty crappy when standing against photoshop (batch processing aside) but IR looks damn good when u put it alongside fireworks. Adobe just seem to have a better grasp on interface design than macromedia do. Of course it doesn;t help when adobe keep trying to sue them for copying their interfaces:)... anyway rants aside, keep this thread coming, I really want a good wsywig HTML editor, but at the moment i lean more towards topStyle and realistically I do almost everything in notepad.