Satann Coulter
Out of context: Reply #219
- Started
- Last post
- 261 Responses
- gramme0
I don't see science as a failure. I thought ID was trying to be science? It's dishonest as an idea if it's original conceit is that the scientific method is flawed and inadequate for explaining reality. Claims like that require proof.
Mimio
(Jun 16 06, 08:01)Science has not yet been able to explain the origin of the universe beyond a reasonable doubt. And when we start talking about an infinite regression, which is what evolutionary theory suggests, then your 'science' becomes philosophy, just like Creation Theory.
I think both methods of explaining origins are by nature philosophical matters, because we're dealing with many things that cannot be observed or calculated. Science has very clear limits in this area. Science is based upon observation, and there was NEVER any observations of the Big Bang. That is pure, unadulterated philosophy my friend, plain & simple.
Unfortunately, in this 'advanced' day & age, we still can't come up with all the answers using empirical methods. Faith has to come in somewhere, and everyone believes in something.