<-- DNKY vs TKNY
Out of context: Reply #47
- Started
- Last post
- 53 Responses
- fuckfascists0
What they could have problems with is Count 1 concerns the general trademark application process; I see verbage in 15 USC 1051 about "likely to cause confusion", not a requirement of actual confusion. Similarly, Count 2 is for a "false designation", probably based on the closeness of DKNY to TKNY: 15 USC 1125(a)(1)(A) says "is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive as to the affiliation, connection, or association of such person with another person, or as to the origin, sponsorship, or approval of his or her goods, services, or commercial activities by another person ..."
i have a friend whos going to speak to a trademark/intellectual property attorney for me. i will pass the info on to them.
BTW, Ill be there tonight. If you recognize me, say hello :)