Darwin's meme: or the origin of culture by means of natural selection
Out of context: Reply #98
- Started
- Last post
- 100 Responses
- Brookoioioi0
that's right, dobs. As we've discussed a thousand times before. ID has philosophical/theisitic implications.
Be vigilant in your redundancy. The more you repeat yourself, the more likely others will believe you!
Darwinian Evolution has philosophical/theisi tic implications.
The Big Bang has philosophical/theisi tic implications.
Remember that your ko0ky klaims are 'facts', and that 'facts' do not require proof.
As Dr. Stephen Meyer says quite well:
"Thus, ID is not based on religion, but on scientific discoveries and our experience of cause and effect, the basis of all scientific reasoning about the past. Unlike creationism, ID is an inference from biological data.
Quote notorious scientists or writers - it makes it look as if they approve the drivel you are writing!
...ID may provide support for theistic belief. But that is not grounds for dismissing it. Those who do, confuse the evidence for the theory with its possible implications. Many astrophysicists initially rejected the Big Bang theory because it seemed to point to the need for a transcendent cause of matter, space and time. But science eventually accepted it because the evidence strongly supported it.
• Incoherency is not a roadblock to poasting(2).
• Neither is illiteracy.
• Delusions poasted often enough become fact.Today, a similar prejudice confronts ID. Nevertheless, this new theory must also be evaluated on the basis of the evidence, not philosophical preferences. As Professor Flew advises: "We must follow the evidence, wherever it leads.""
Keep in mind that lack of evidence supporting your konspiracy theory actually _is_ evidence, of how effective the konspiracy is in hiding.