Darwin's meme: or the origin of culture by means of natural selection
Out of context: Reply #77
- Started
- Last post
- 100 Responses
- flagellum0
But Brooke, there is no empirical evidence for Dawkin's brand of religious memes. You have nothing but hand-waving assumptions. It's pure speculation. So, you are call the kettle black, here.
Secondly, there is empirical evidence which supports religion. Take for instance the historical facts surrounding the resurrection of Christ.
Independant evidence for a Creator? Let's see:
1. DNA - digital specified information at the core of life.
2. The fine tuning of the cosmological constants.
3. The abrupt influx of biological information in the abrupt appearance of animal phyla sans antecedants.
4. The human conscience and it's inability to be reduced to matter.
I'm afraid this data is already making it's way into scientific journals (happy to link it for you). It's time to wake up and let go of old ideas, Brook.