EXXON Mobile
Out of context: Reply #112
- Started
- Last post
- 152 Responses
- ********0
what the f*ck is your point jazx?
that its OK to force a repeat of prehistoric carbon levels...?
do we need to school you on what the socio-economic impacts are going to be? and get your republican ass thinking about the cost benefit analysis of NOT getting our carbon emissions undercontrol?
spk
(Jan 30 06, 14:57)of course there is no reason to return to prehistoric levels, but that's not to say that it would completely destroy us as a planet, even if it did. Why is it you ignore the other theories that are out there that might be causing CO2 to rise?
I can accept that fuel emmissions need to be curbed and that we strain the Earth's resources. However, even if we do this it might not matter much. Who's to say that it will crub the total effect? Especially since it has happened in the past, recorded in the rock record, without human endeavors.