EXXON Mobile
Out of context: Reply #93
- Started
- Last post
- 152 Responses
- ********0
Since Mars and Venus are warming without human involvement, why is warming on the Earth only possibly caused by humans?
According to tree ring and core data, the temperature dropped suddenly around 1550 and stayed that way until 1850, this period had the coldest temperatures in the previous 8,000 years. Greenland was named Greenland because prior to 1550 it was green. Global Warming alarmists pick 1880, thirty years after the most brutal cold spell in history ended, as the target temperature for the Earth. Why?
Why is it that when you find a climatologist that concedes that volcanic activity has been exceptionally active for the last 25 years, that they say that CO2 from volcanoes actually helps cool the Earth. (High atmosphere CO2 prevents entry of heat.)
From the previous point: since that CO2 in the high atmosphere descends to the lower atmosphere, doesn't that mean we are in for hellishly high temperatures in the future anyway?
Since the Artic was tropical up until 36 million years ago, why is it that plugging in the CO2 data for time period into climate models results temperature way below what was expected?
Assuming that the climate model was accurate to start with, doesn't mean that there are factors that you are unaware of?
Since there is a direct correlation between sunspots and global temperatures, why is sunspot activity ignored in those models? (Record temperatures were all set in the 1930's and 40's, the decadal oscillation people say that it will be as cold as it was in the 1960's early '70s within 30 years because of the expected sunspot cycle.)
------------
Interesting huh?