EXXON Mobile

Out of context: Reply #79

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 152 Responses
  • pavlovs_dog0

    not enough overall data to date, they haven't been tracking this very long, plain and simple. too much guessing. come back and argue about it 50 to 100 years from now. even that is a blink of an eye in comparison to most of how old most scientists think things can be dated.
    JazX
    (Jan 30 06, 13:13)

    ^

    100% rubbish.

    believe what you WANT TO beacuse that's the key here... you dont WANT TO accept the truth because you would have to take responsiblity for your actions...

    please tell me whwt i have to gain for accepting all this climate change nonsense?

    This is soo much like the i.d. argument... the people that oppose it do so not based on objective analysis, they do WANT TO accept the outcome.

    Did you know the moon landing was faked?

    Prove it wasn't

    pavlovs_dog 0Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
      Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
      SaveCancel

    View thread