Darwinist

Out of context: Reply #370

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 592 Responses
  • ********
    0

    JaxX - my point is that it seems to me that evolutionary scientists take a range of comparable data and weigh it against each other - carbon dating being one of an array of trying to pinpoint the age of a fossil, not the sole method. From geology, to other finds in the fossil record, skeletal structure, etc...and that by using simply the known and admitted inaccuracies in carbon dating and using that as a sole point of contention by ID proponents to say the whol esystem is false seems to me both a failure of critical thinking and intellectual dishonesty of the highest sort.

View thread