Darwinist
Out of context: Reply #345
- Started
- Last post
- 592 Responses
- flagellum0
Tick, you are simple. Thank you for that definition of science. Now please show me how Darwinian Macro evolution is testable & falsifiable, thus making it scientific? So, you see, there are some things which pretend to be science but are thoroughly unscientific if we go by the conventional lemon test. Furthermore, you like all the other uninformed, conflate Creationism with Intelligent Design. So, you lose credibility because you don't understand the issues.
There were no Priest-Kings during evolutionary timeframes which had 0 technological advancement. It is "primitive stone age" man we are talking about. Learn about what you are trying to support.
Current scientific findings have abolished and continue to threaten the extinction of pseudo-enlightenment notions. We have new data, we should pay attention to it. Your fathers of the so-called-enlightenment didn't know about the cell, let alone DNA.
The websites I post list very very specific scientific data and research... far from propaganda. It is you who lacks critical thinking as you consistently dodge the science which link and provide and opt for rhetoric.
Web design is cool.