Darwinist
Darwinist
Out of context: Reply #343
- Started
- Last post
- 592 Responses
- ********0
The fact that they call it absolute dating is ridiculous, because it's not absolute and you're right discipler.
JazX
(Jan 6 06, 06:23)
----------------------
JazX, in all honesty, and please enlighten me, as I am not up to snuff on the ins and outs of carbon dating, but is the technique so questionable to give false results consistently - or even have measrures of error on the scale of millions or hundreds of thousands of years? I mean, even if it has problems, can it still peg something within a few hundred thousand years or even a million?