Darwinist
Out of context: Reply #342
- Started
- Last post
- 592 Responses
- Nairn0
I'm sorry.
I just see more evidence of there not being a God than 'tother way around. Occum's Razor-like, if you will.
I can appreciate the path of organisation from the quantum netherworld through atoms, molecules, cells, evolution etc. I can appreciate something of the formation of our planet, system and universe. I can begin to imagine something of the whole of reality.
And this is where the crux of the difference between us lies.
At the edge of my comprehension, I have to give in to some kind of faith or belief to fill in the gaps of my knowledge.
Here, I see no need for Godhead or supernatural abstraction.
I'll admit, I can't preclude their existence, but just as equally, I have faith in the supposition that they are not required.
You and your kind, on the other hand, feel the need for this figure, and whatever that may bring with it.
We are fundamentally opposed.
We've all said our piece.
We've all made our case.
We'll all believe in what we will.
You're not likely to convince us otherwise.
So.
Please.
Drop it.
It's Friday. Let's talk about ME GOING SKIING FOR TWO WEEKS IN FRANCE TOMORROW.. YAAAAAY.
*the end.